independent investigation 04.01.2003 (2003)

"Unreturned debts".

The topic of monetary debts is discussed in the latest episode of the program "Independent investigation".

Practice has shown that most conflicts between creditors and debtors arise due to the lack of a clear legal basis defining their relationship.

In this regard, the studio will consider specific cases of debtors and creditors and possible ways out of the problematic situation.

The first story of the program.

Vladimir Starostin lent his friend Nikolai Ilkin 25,000 US dollars, who in turn decided not to repay the debt, and for less money hired a killer for his creditor.

The killer - Borzeev Alik did not carry out the order, the murder did not take place.

For an official attempt to return his money, Starostin ended up in prison under the article "extortion".

At the time when Starostin was already under investigation, Ilkin N. committed suicide.

Law enforcement agencies considered that Starostin was guilty of this, since he drove his debtor to suicide, and ordered him to pay Ilkin's widow 33,000 US dollars.

Starostin was sentenced to 9 years in prison, of which he served half.

Starostin is now free, and the money has not been returned to him.

Video: Raisa Ilkina, the wife of Nikolai Ilkin N., says that her husband did not borrow money from Starostin.

An unknown person talks about a visit from criminal figures to Starostin.

Livzans Evgeny -- investigator about the Starostin case.

Starostin Vladimir about his arrest by RUBOP. Raisa Ilkina says that Starostin extorted money.

In the studio, Starostin V. about the rehabilitation of his good name, Ilkin's suicide.

Musa Borzeev, brother of Borzeev A., says that his brother did not intend to kill Starostin V. Popov Valery is a witness about a conversation with Ilkin about a new loan, rumors about an order to kill Starostin.

Livzans Evgeny about the investigation of Starostin's case.

Starostin V. talks about the witness Khanykov Alexander.

Kalinichenko Vladimir about lending money without documents in the presence of witnesses.

Tyurin G. about witness testimony in court.

Zamyatin S. about the notarization of a loan agreement.

Kalinichenko V.I. answers the question about which official bodies are engaged in the search for debtors.

Tyurin G. about the importance of a receipt, according to which a debt can be claimed.

Starostin V. says that he put pressure on Ilkin in order to obtain a receipt and describes a personal meeting with Ilkin's family.

Sakhno Andrey about the work of bailiffs in relation to debtors.

Zamyatin S. talks about the correct drafting of a promissory note.

Kalinichenko V. I. about the Starostin case.

Manakhov Sergey about the laws prohibiting the use of force when collecting debts.

Zamyatin S. about citizens' appeals to criminal structures for help in collecting debts.

The second story of the program is dedicated to debt collection agencies.

Video: An editorial staff member calls agencies and finds out the prices for their services.

Starostin V. and Manakhov S. talk about debt collection agencies.

Rakhmanin Sergey, Gromov Nikolay -- employees of a debt collection agency about their work and prices.

Tyurin G. about the types of debt collection agencies and their methods of work.

Sakhno A. answers the question whether it is more dangerous to be a creditor or a debtor at the moment.

The third story of the program is dedicated to contract killings.

Video: Documentary footage of crime news.

Sychev Pavel about contract killings and fraud with interest.

A story about Khabarovsk businessman Vladimir Oleynikov, who lent $1,500 to employees of the Korean trade mission.

The receipt stated that in the event of failure to repay the money within the period set by the creditor, the debtor was obliged to pay one percent of the total amount daily.

When all the debt repayment periods expired, it became clear that Oleynikov would not be repaid.

Today, according to the official promissory note of Korean diplomatic representatives, the amount subject to return exceeds $100 billion.

Oleynikov's appeals to the DPRK authorities have remained unanswered.

Oleynikov's case has been pending in Strasbourg for a year.

In the studio, Oleynikov V. says that he expects to receive the amount from the debtor.

Tyurin G. about the receipt drawn up by Oleynikov V. and the impossibility of winning the case.

Sorokin Andrey, an employee of the debt collection agency, gives an example from practice on the return of a large debt.

Starostin V. about the return of his debt to creditors.